{"id":45722,"date":"2021-08-26T12:19:39","date_gmt":"2021-08-26T10:19:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.burks.de\/burksblog\/?p=45722"},"modified":"2021-08-26T12:32:56","modified_gmt":"2021-08-26T10:32:56","slug":"45722","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.burks.de\/burksblog\/2021\/08\/26\/45722","title":{"rendered":"Populare Religioten"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"taliban\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Sehr interessanter Artikel auf counterpunch.org<\/a>: „Eight Key Points on America\u2019s Defeat in Afghanistan“.<\/p>\n

Ich hatte \u00e4hnliche Fragen: Hat in Afghanistan eine Art Revolution stattgefunden? Die milit\u00e4rische Taktik der, die sich Taliban nennen, entspricht der klassischen Guerilla-Taktik: Einsickern, infiltrieren, \u00fcbernehmen<\/a>, wenn der Feind schwach ist usw.. Aber gibt es auch „rechte“ Revolutionen? Hat sich gar der Klassenkampf, mit h\u00e4mischem Grinsen, dieses Mal religiotisch-antiimperialistisch kost\u00fcmiert?<\/p>\n

No leftist worth their claim of commitment to humanistic, egalitarian, and revolutionary ideals like socialism and communism would ever root for reactionary Islamic jihadists who brutally oppress women while slaughtering ordinary civilians and imposing a backwards, fundamentalist, and neo-feudal theology justifying that oppression and slaughter.<\/i><\/p>\n

Der Artikel gibt acht Antworten:
\n– The Taliban and Al Qaeda are Uncle Sam\u2019s bastard children, to no small extent<\/i>.<\/p>\n

– Second, the United States does not intervene in other countries\u2019 internal affairs for humanistic purposes<\/i>.<\/p>\n

– Third, the US has a long record of supporting and even imposing deeply reactionary regimes around the world<\/i> – unstrittig, dass das afghanische Marionetten-Regime von Gnaden der USA eine korrupte Bande war, unter die der Bev\u00f6lkerung genauso gelitten hat wie unter den Taliban.<\/p>\n

– Fourth: …the US has consistently driven people into the arms of anti-imperial resistance movements through its soulless murder and maiming of masses of ordinary people in their own homelands, far from US shores and borders<\/i> – der aktuelle „Spiegel“ f\u00fchrt eine lange Liste von Kriegsverbrechen an, die die USA und ihrer Verb\u00fcndeten in Afghanistan begangen haben. (Das f\u00e4llt ihnen „fr\u00fch“ auf.) Kernsatz: …every American bomb just drove more young Afghans into the resistance.<\/i><\/p>\n

– Fifth: …Islamic fundamentalism has arisen in the political and economic vacuum left by the US-led imperialist defeat of independent secular Third World nationalism in the Muslim world.<\/i><\/p>\n

– Sixth, chances of left and progressive, humanistic forces challenging the jihadists going forward in Afghanistan are only enhanced by the eviction of the American Empire<\/i>.<\/p>\n

– Seventh, the United States\u2019 claim to humanitarian and democratic concern is illegitimate<\/i>. „Westliche Werte“ gibt es nicht, wenn man sich die blutige Geschichte von Miit\u00e4rinterventionen und Kriegen ansieht, die die USA angezettelt haben.<\/p>\n

– Eighth, while the Taliban is terrible, it does offer a good global example and role model in one sense: it shows again (as did the Cubans and the Vietnamese from 1959 through 1975) that Superpower can be defeated even by small and poor nations through dedicated popular resistance.<\/i>.<\/p>\n

Das genau ist die Frage: Sind die Taliban popular<\/i>? Ich f\u00fcrchte, die Antwort ist „ja“. Und daran ist unter anderem die Intervention der „westlichen“ Alliierten in Afghanistan schuld.<\/p>\n

\"image_pdf\"<\/a>\"image_print\"<\/a><\/div>
<\/div>