{"id":32174,"date":"2017-05-21T14:36:32","date_gmt":"2017-05-21T12:36:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.burks.de\/burksblog\/?p=32174"},"modified":"2017-05-21T14:36:32","modified_gmt":"2017-05-21T12:36:32","slug":"fashionable-nonsense-oder-the-conceptual-penis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.burks.de\/burksblog\/2017\/05\/21\/fashionable-nonsense-oder-the-conceptual-penis","title":{"rendered":"Fashionable Nonsense oder: The conceptual Penis"},"content":{"rendered":"

Leseempfehlung<\/a> (via Fefe): „The conceptual penis as a social construct\u201d is a Sokal-style hoax on gender studies“. – „The androcentric scientific and meta-scientific evidence that the penis is the male reproductive organ is considered overwhelming and largely uncontroversial.“<\/p>\n

„Subsequently, Sokal and the Belgian physicist Jean Bricmont noted in their 1997 book Fashionable Nonsense<\/a>\"\", that certain kinds of ideas can become so fashionable that the critical faculties required for the peer-review process are compromised, allowing outright nonsense to be published, so long as it looks or sounds a certain way, or promotes certain values.“<\/p>\n

Ich musste auch an die „Online-Durchsuchung<\/a>“ denken.<\/p>\n

\"image_pdf\"<\/a>\"image_print\"<\/a><\/div>
<\/div>