{"id":30478,"date":"2016-09-10T05:00:01","date_gmt":"2016-09-10T03:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.burks.de\/burksblog\/?p=30478"},"modified":"2016-09-10T05:01:59","modified_gmt":"2016-09-10T03:01:59","slug":"on-the-physics-of-high-rise-building-collapses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.burks.de\/burksblog\/2016\/09\/10\/on-the-physics-of-high-rise-building-collapses","title":{"rendered":"On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses"},"content":{"rendered":"

EuroPhysicsNews<\/a> (EPN), ein renommiertes Physik-Fachjournal, herausgegeben vom Dachverband der europ\u00e4ischen Physikgesellschaften, \u00fcber einst\u00fcrzende Hochh\u00e4user:<\/p>\n

It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9\/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.<\/i><\/p>\n

Mal sehen, was davon in deutschen Mainstream-Medien<\/a> auftaucht.<\/p>\n

\"image_pdf\"<\/a>\"image_print\"<\/a><\/div>
<\/div>