{"id":19744,"date":"2013-08-14T10:18:29","date_gmt":"2013-08-14T08:18:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.burks.de\/burksblog\/?p=19744"},"modified":"2013-08-14T10:20:02","modified_gmt":"2013-08-14T08:20:02","slug":"unverzeihicher-leichtsinn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.burks.de\/burksblog\/2013\/08\/14\/unverzeihicher-leichtsinn","title":{"rendered":"Unverzeihlicher Leichtsinn und die Furcht, nicht patriotisch genug zu sein"},"content":{"rendered":"

Edward Snowden in einem Interview mit der New York Times<\/a> (via Fefe<\/a>) auf die Frage, warum er denn mit seinem Material nicht zu ihnen gekommen sei:<\/p>\n

After 9\/11, many of the most important news outlets in America abdicated their role as a check to power \u2014 the journalistic responsibility to challenge the excesses of government \u2014 for fear of being seen as unpatriotic and punished in the market during a period of heightened nationalism. From a business perspective, this was the obvious strategy, but what benefited the institutions ended up costing the public dearly. The major outlets are still only beginning to recover from this cold period.<\/i><\/p>\n

Sch\u00f6n ist auch das hier:
\nI was surprised to realize that there were people in news organizations who didn\u2019t recognize any unencrypted message sent over the Internet is being delivered to every intelligence service in the world. In the wake of this year\u2019s disclosures, it should be clear that unencrypted journalist-source communication is unforgivably reckless. <\/i><\/p>\n

\"image_pdf\"<\/a>\"image_print\"<\/a><\/div>
<\/div>